Cost model
Fee calculation without marketing claims
The calculator uses a public baseline for comparison. It does not promise a discount and does not replace the rate shown in your account.
The editorial priority is a balanced decision across fees, product access, account security, custody controls and withdrawal testing. Readers checking Bangladesh should also document BDT funding costs, the onboarding entity and product-specific restrictions. The primary platform scope is the compared platforms. For a multi-platform review, use the same order size, pair, funding route and security checklist so the comparison measures like-for-like conditions. This guide assumes that regional rules and product access can change, so every decision needs a current check.
Start with execution
A limit order is not automatically a maker order. If it matches immediately, it can be charged as taker. The final classification is determined by execution, not the label selected in the order ticket.
Add the hidden cost layers
For a realistic estimate, add spread and likely slippage to both sides of a trade. For perpetual contracts, include opening and closing fees plus funding payments. For moving assets, compare the exact withdrawal network and minimum withdrawal amount.
Use the account rate as the final authority
Public tables are useful for orientation. Account tier, region, trading pair and temporary campaigns can override the baseline. Save a screenshot or export of the applicable rate when documenting a high-value decision.
Reviewed sources
Baseline fee table
Illustrative baseline only. Pair, region, VIP level and promotions can change the live rate.
| Exchange | Spot maker / taker | Futures maker / taker | Checks and links |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binance | 0.10% / 0.10% | 0.02% / 0.05% | |
| OKX | 0.08% / 0.10% | 0.02% / 0.05% | |
| Bybit | 0.10% / 0.10% | 0.02% / 0.055% | |
| Bitget | 0.10% / 0.10% | 0.02% / 0.06% |